Old Version
Netizen Watch

Mandatory Cut in Routine Exams Sparks Testy Debate over Educational Evaluation

Reducing exam frequency could ease excessive competition among students and families.

By NewsChina Updated Apr.1

Netizen Comments: 
“Reducing exam frequency could ease excessive competition among students and families. Some parents might feel uneasy without concrete exam results to evaluate their children’s academic performance. No matter what, this is an important step in education reform. In the short term, some might find it difficult to adapt, but it benefits student’s holistic development in the long run.” 

• “The ultimate aim of primary and secondary education is still training students to take the zhongkao and gaokao. As long as they remain the sole criteria to select talent, no reform will truly shake the foundation of the exam-oriented system or ‘rat race’ status quo.”  

• “This policy disadvantages unprivileged families. Even though schools do not organize tests and exams, students from well-off families can still assess their academic level through private tutoring institutions, while students from unprivileged families may not be able to afford them.” Source: Zhihu 

Media Comments: 
Luo Yihua, Party branch secretary, Changgang Donglu Primary School, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province:“Traditional exams focus on knowledge mastery and ranking. Our school has abandoned rigid rankings and transcripts, instead establishing a diverse evaluation system. During finals season, every student at our school complete challenging yet interesting academic tasks, like explorers. They receive individualized reports that record how they approached and solved the problems.” Source: Xinhua  

Li Yang, assistant researcher at the Research Institution of Educational Theory, National Institute of Education Sciences in Beijing:“The recent policy will not ease parents’ anxieties. Many worry about how students will prepare for the zhongkao and gaokao without enough exams to show their academic performance. This reflects a deeper predicament in education evaluation: Society detests the highly competitive exam-oriented system, yet remains uncertain and uneasy about abandoning quantitative testing altogether.” Source: Global Times  

Xin Tao, director of the China Basic Education Quality Monitoring Collaborative Innovation Center at Beijing Normal University:“In the age of AI, the importance of diplomas is declining. A high gaokao score no longer guarantees a good job. To adapt to future trends, it is necessary to break from our reliance on traditional exam- oriented evaluations.” Source: CCTV News 
China’s decision to sharply reduce routine exams for primary and secondary students has reignited a long-simmering debate over how learning should be measured in the era of AI. 
 
Under the rules issued on December 16, 2025, written tests are banned entirely for first and second grade students. For other primary grades, schools may organize only one final exam per semester. Middle schools are allowed one final exam and an additional midterm exam per semester. Similar rules were announced in 2021.  

In response, cities including Chengdu, Sichuan Province and Guangzhou, Guangdong Province have announced bans on regional or cross-school standardized final exams in core subjects for non-graduating grades, allowing individual schools to conduct their own evaluations.  

These moves aim to reduce excessive academic burdens and shift education away from an exam- and ranking-centered mindset.  

Public reaction, however, has been divided. Many netizens view the policy as a meaningful attempt to break with China’s long-standing exam-oriented evaluation system and to establish a more diverse system for academic assessment. Some pointed out that reform is particularly necessary in the age of AI, as traditional exams primarily focus on rote memorization and exam-taking skills, while future talent need creativity, critical thinking and collaboration skills.  

However, some have argued that without reforming the two most crucial exams – the high school entrance examination (zhongkao) and the national college entrance examination (gaokao) – the exam-oriented system will remain fundamentally unchanged. Students’ academic burdens will not be meaningfully alleviated, nor will the intense competition be eased.

Print